Were roman soldiers gay

He doesn't need to reproduce because He is Eternal. In the Roman military of the Republic period, any manifestations of homosexuality were severely exterminated. Latin lacks words that would precisely translate "homosexual" and "heterosexual".

God is non-sexual. Specifically Roman women. No, he's not. See romans. Some were, but most weren't. Specifically, love and relationships soldier Roman soldiers are, at most, pretty common. But some gay Roman men wore it too.

Their descendents are gay as likely to be gay as any other folks. The bible plainly teaches that homosexuality in the eyes of god is a sinful thing that god hates. Wiki User. But he also had sex with females and even eunuchs.

The problem here is with the question: the ancient Greeks and Romans had no words and hence no concept of what we call gay. Homosexuality in ancient Rome differed markedly from the contemporary West. While explicit evidence about homosexuality in the Roman army is limited, historical accounts and cultural norms provide some context.

Romans 1 makes it clear that homosexuality is a sin. For what it's worth, Dr. Alfred Kinsey surveyed several thousand American males during the 's's and found that roughly 30 per cent of them had had at least one homosexual experience to orgasm.

But why exactly is there roman to no record of their stories?. The Fall of the Roman Empire had many factors, including corruption, bad political decisions, economic problems, and military problems. To some extent, the "sexes" were regarded as "dominant" and "submissive" rather than strictly "male" or "female.

It goes totally against his plan for his creation man. Probably not, though the culture of ancient Rome was rather different than modern culture. God also could not be gay because God cannot sin. The ancient Romans were probably just as likely to be gay as other people,as well, but since people back then didn't get all worked up about how "awful" it was to be gay, the ancient Romans were more likely to express it.

[1] The primary dichotomy of ancient Roman sexuality was active / dominant / masculine and passive / submissive / feminine. But gay Romans had were to do with it. Research since then in America and abroad has not significantly changed that statistic, so there's a pretty good chance that ratio applied to the ancient Romans, as well.

At the same time, I do not mean to suggest that every soldier was involved in sexual acts with his male slaves and that same-sex sexual relations were practised universally throughout the Roman army. He gave mankind the gift of sex because we need to reproduce.

If you are asking whether Alexander had sex with males, the answer is yes. The Romans called London "Londinium". The Holiday originated as a festival called "Saturnalia" among Roman Pagans, but there was no mention in any records of their sexual orientations.

Roman society was patriarchal, and the freeborn male citizen possessed political liberty (libertas) and the right. The Roman army was a highly structured and disciplined institution, and soldiers were expected to prioritize loyalty, duty, and camaraderie.

Technically, there are no "Romans" any more. A Roman soldier, like every free and self-respecting Roman, was socially obligated to discipline, also in matters of sexuality.